5 Comments
User's avatar
Will Orr-Ewing's avatar

Great essay!

Your top bit about scones & Paddington is the death cult that is British twee. It needs putting out of its misery asap.

I agree with you about the 20th C. “The machine has no tradition” and so many British traditions are paper thin in the face of rapidly developing technology.

I agree too about Norman and Saxon. But as you suggest in your discussion on the class system, the Norman Conquest is still playing itself out: the feudal (and related deferential) aspect of British culture remains underemphasised imo.

Henry Oliver's avatar

yeah it is fair enough to say I am presenting one part of the story

Joshua Gaskell's avatar

Excellent piece. I think the focus on individualism is right – down with tweeslop. Reminded me a bit of Orwell’s own ‘The English People’. Might re-read before kick-off against Argentina!

Paul Devine's avatar

What is Britishness? Englishness began with Athelstan and continued in a remarkably straight line through Magna Carta, the Reformation, the Glorious Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, the World Wars, the Beatles and Margaret Thatcher, before quietly becoming Britishness in the final paragraph. I actually enjoyed the middle bit to be fair.

Cecilia Farell 🇨🇦's avatar

A culture does not last unless it adapts and evolves. What about your immigrants, of which you have and have had many? Are they not included in Britishness? Because in Canada they are definitely part of what it means to be Canadian. To be an immigrant from India living in Brampton is as Canadian as is being Sir John A. Macdonald, Pierre Trudeau, Lester B. Pearson, or Inuit living in Nunavut.